Compare
webhookwire vs RequestBin
RequestBin is a well-known name for request inspection. Today requestbin.com redirects to Pipedream, whose HTTP-triggered workflows offer similar inspection.
Both tools help you see the HTTP requests a system sends. This page sticks to facts we could check in RequestBin's own documentation or website on 29 October 2026. Products change, so check their site for the latest details. If anything here is out of date, please tell us and we will correct it.
| Feature | webhookwire | RequestBin |
|---|---|---|
| Current status | Active | requestbin.com redirects to Pipedream, which announced its Workflows product is shutting down on March 31, 2027 |
| What you get | A webhook URL with a live inspector | A Pipedream workflow with an HTTP trigger and an event inspector |
| Accepted methods | GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS | Any valid HTTP method |
| Largest request body | 1.0 MB accepted, first 64 KB stored | 512 KB; larger bodies get 413 but still appear in the inspector |
| Default response | 200 with a small JSON body | 200 with a short "Success!" message |
| Custom response | Status, headers, body and delay | Configurable |
| Run code on each request | No | Yes, with workflow code steps |
| Data lifetime | Deleted after 72 hours | Not stated in the pages we checked |
| Account needed | No | Not stated in the pages we checked |
When RequestBin is a better fit
- You already build on Pipedream and want to run code on each request before its shutdown date.
- You need to transform or route events to other services, not just inspect them.
When webhookwire is a better fit
- You only need to see what a webhook sends, with no workflow to set up.
- You want a tool with no announced shutdown date and no account.
- You need larger request bodies, up to 1 MB.
- You want captured data deleted automatically within days.
Sources (checked 29 October 2026)
RequestBin is a trademark of its respective owner. webhookwire is not affiliated with or endorsed by RequestBin.